Skip to content
Workflow Automation / Moon Sherpa LabsMOON SHERPA / LABS

Less chasing.
A clearer handoff.

The work between your tools is still work. We connect the steps people copy, forward, check, and chase—so a request can reach the right destination with its context intact.

  • Rules before complexity
  • Visible exceptions
  • Useful handoffs

Operational design / Follow the handoff

The exception is part of the workflow.

A reliable automation knows what a complete input looks like, what has already happened, and where a person needs to step in.

SUBJECT STUDY / 02
Let a known case move cleanly.Validate the required fields, create the work item, and return a receipt. A defined handoff gives the next person the information they need. Input: A new request with required details. Result: One work item and a traceable receipt. An illustrative service request router. Change the event to see the route and the resulting record.Let a known case move cleanly.Validate the required fields, create the work item, and return a receipt. A defined handoff gives the next person the information they need. Input: A new request with required details. Result: One work item and a traceable receipt. An illustrative service request router. Change the event to see the route and the resulting record.

An illustrative service request router. Change the event to see the route and the resulting record.

Choose an incoming event

THE DECISION IN VIEW

Let a known case move cleanly.

Validate the required fields, create the work item, and return a receipt. A defined handoff gives the next person the information they need.

Start with
A new request with required details
Make possible
One work item and a traceable receipt

The happy path still needs an owner, a record, and an observable result.

ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL · NO LIVE ACCOUNT OR CUSTOMER DATA

The opportunity

Start where the handoff breaks.

A form arrives in one system. Someone copies it into another, forwards the attachment, checks whether it was seen, and updates a spreadsheet. Each step may be small; together they make the process hard to trust.

We map that path with the people responsible for it. The first release should remove a specific piece of repeated work and make the remaining decisions easier to see.

What we can build

Common places to make room in the day.

Intake and routing

Check a request for the information it needs, apply agreed routing rules, and send the responsible person a useful handoff.

Documents and preparation

Extract or organize relevant information, generate a draft or report, and route it for review before the next action.

Connected status updates

Keep supported systems in step when a record changes. Define the source of truth and how duplicate or out-of-order events are handled.

Reminders and exceptions

Make due work and stalled handoffs visible. Route unresolved cases to a person with enough context to take over.

The decision, made clearer

Match the method to the work.

A process looks like…A practical approachThe design question
Known triggers and standard app connectionsA visual workflow or existing integrationCan your team understand and maintain it?
Specific rules across several systemsA custom API workflowWhich system owns each piece of information?
Unstructured text or documentsAn AI-assisted step with validationWhat evidence makes the output acceptable?
A judgment or exceptionA clear human handoffWho decides, and what do they need to see?

A good starting point

A recurring process with identifiable inputs, an owner, and a recognizable finish. Frequency matters, but so does the cost of a missed handoff.

A boundary worth discussing

A process that changes its rules every time needs clarification before automation. We first make the decision points explicit rather than encoding an unstable routine.

Working together

Design around the exception, too.

  1. Walk the current process

    Follow an ordinary request and an awkward one. Capture the time spent waiting as well as the time spent doing.

  2. Define the handoffs

    Agree the trigger, source of truth, responsible person, completion signal, and path for exceptions.

  3. Build and replay

    Run representative examples through the connected path. Check duplicates, missing information, and unavailable systems.

  4. Put ownership in place

    Deliver documentation, visibility into runs, and a clear plan for the team that will operate the workflow.

In practice

Automation in the shape of the business.

A home-care operation needs connected enrollment and visit records. A restaurant needs a calendar staff can update themselves. The useful system follows the actual workflow.

Local Growth · Rules Engine · Ops Automation

Live Oak Home Access

An accessibility and home-care business with a funding check, online booking, maintenance-plan enrollment, and a client portal for visits, reports, and billing.

Inside the build

Hospitality · Live Events · Web

Evangeline Café

An Astro restaurant website with a Google Sheets music calendar, three calendar views, and upcoming-event filtering—so the live lineup stays connected to the staff who manage it.

Inside the build

Explore the working pattern

Find the missing context before the handoff.

Run a fictional service intake, disconnect the source, and decide what can move forward. A useful workflow makes missing information visible and gives the next person enough context to continue.

Workflow laboratory / 04

The work, in motion.

Illustrative workflow
No live customer data

Ready when you areSYS / 00
Homeowner answersService areaProgram guidanceHUMAN FEEDBACKSignal01Context02Prepare03Review04Handoff05CONTEXT → CAPABILITY → CONTROLEvery handoff has a human boundary.
Inside the workflow01 / 05

A useful starting point

The first question finds a clear next step

Signal

A fictional homeowner asks about making a front entrance easier to use and exploring possible funding.

Run the scenario to follow the whole path, or take it one step at a time.

See the real work: Live Oak Home Access

Try disconnecting the source to see how missing information changes the path.

Before we begin

The useful questions.

What is business process automation?

It is the use of software to connect recurring steps such as intake, validation, routing, approvals, and record updates. A good workflow makes ownership and completion clear, including when a person needs to intervene.

Which process should we automate first?

Look for repeated work with clear inputs and an outcome you can verify. Compare the frequency, waiting time, error cost, and maintenance effort. The first candidate should be important enough to matter and focused enough to complete.

Do we need AI for workflow automation?

No. Predictable rules and supported integrations can cover many processes. A model is useful where the work involves interpretation, such as classifying text or preparing a draft, and its output can be checked.

Can we maintain a visual automation ourselves?

That can be a good goal for a straightforward workflow. We choose the implementation around the team’s skills and document how it works. More involved logic and integrations may need an agreed development support arrangement.

What happens when a connected system is unavailable?

The design should make the failure visible, preserve the work needed to resume, and avoid repeating an action that already completed. The appropriate retry and handoff behavior depends on the operation.

How do you estimate the project?

We scope the systems, branches, exception paths, data preparation, and operational support. Walking through real examples gives a more reliable estimate than counting the boxes in a workflow diagram.

What processes can actually be automated?

Rule-based steps with clear inputs and outcomes: data entry, document routing, approvals, notifications, and system-to-system updates. Work that requires judgment on ambiguous cases stays with a person, though a model can prepare a draft or classification for that person to check.

What is no-code workflow automation?

Building a workflow by connecting pre-built triggers and actions in a visual tool—Zapier, Make, n8n—rather than writing custom integration code. It's a good fit when the platform's supported connectors already cover your systems; custom development becomes worthwhile once the logic, volume, or connections outgrow what a no-code tool handles cleanly.

Let’s make it concrete

Bring the spreadsheet, the inbox, or the awkward workaround.

The best starting point is the process your team already knows takes too much chasing.

Map a better workflow